10-24-2017, 11:41 AM
Careful with "ridiculous"! ![[Image: motzi15x18.gif]](http://www.macinacs.de/smile/motzi15x18.gif)
What if that lens is "C" priced and delivers "A" performance? I also have no idea how Sigma decides to go C or A - the 30/1.4 is an A? No, also C*. And it's DC DN while the ridiculous ones are only DN (= only mirrorless, but not "only APS-C"? wtf? ![[Image: dknow23x18.gif]](http://www.macinacs.de/smile/dknow23x18.gif)
)
* and no, it's also Art, but these are two different lenses. One for APS-C DSLRs, the other © for only mirrorless.
So, that might make some sense. Not that I'd care about anyway...
And you have no idea about what Fujistas can complain. "bring 4K video to the X-T1, you can do it Fuji, it's only firmware" I think, next to the gods of Russian hackers are the demi-Gods of Fuji firmware, they can do everything you just need to tell them.
![[Image: rotfl28x25.gif]](http://www.macinacs.de/smile/rotfl28x25.gif)
What if that lens is "C" priced and delivers "A" performance? I also have no idea how Sigma decides to go C or A - the 30/1.4 is an A? No, also C*. And it's DC DN while the ridiculous ones are only DN (= only mirrorless, but not "only APS-C"? wtf? )* and no, it's also Art, but these are two different lenses. One for APS-C DSLRs, the other © for only mirrorless.
So, that might make some sense. Not that I'd care about anyway...
And you have no idea about what Fujistas can complain. "bring 4K video to the X-T1, you can do it Fuji, it's only firmware" I think, next to the gods of Russian hackers are the demi-Gods of Fuji firmware, they can do everything you just need to tell them.