01-09-2015, 10:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2015, 11:36 AM by stoppingdown.)
Quote:Edit: I just noticed we don't use this scale consistently across all sections. We'll discuss this internally.
-- Markus
That's precisely the gross comparison I meant and, yes, at the moment it's not possible because of inconsistencies. I think it would be quite useful. For instance, I could have the choice between two lenses: one cheap, and the other costs 1000 €. I'm sure that the latter is "better", but is it better enough to justify the price? If I have experience with a lens in different system, that perhaps I know it actually is worth the money, and I can compare its "class" to the one of the new lens, I can draw some conclusion on the new purchase.
(edited to clarify)
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.