02-05-2014, 08:58 AM
Quote:I am not sure what you are referring to ...
If you take the border numbers of the Zeiss at f/1.8, you have to stop down the Fuji beyond f/4 to match this.
The Zeiss is also sharper in the image center at f/2.2 than the Fuji at f/2.8.
MTF-wise the Zeiss is superior to the Fuji till f/5.6. At f/8 and f/11 the Fuji has a marginal advantage.
... but, according to other tests, the Fuji has got better bokeh. So, if I'm a landscaper, I'm only interested in apertures around f/8, and they are pretty close there; if I'm a portraiture man, sharpness is probably less interesting that bokeh.
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.