Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens?
#2
Martin,

 

I see the typical error of someone who compares apples to pears.

 

You took the 17-40L Test on 8mpix and compared it to the 17-85 test made

on 15mpix. You will agree (eventually after some thinking about it) that

this comparison is useless.

 

Take the tests within the same testfamily if you want to compare naked numbers,

or just compare the trend. You'll see, the 17-40 is indeed better than the 17-85

... and it delivers better pictures also ... nevertheless, I wouldn't swap a

17-85 for a 17-40 on a crop-1.6 camera.

 

just my 2cts ... Rainer

  


Messages In This Thread
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 10:57 AM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by Rainer - 11-14-2013, 11:21 AM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 12:55 PM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 01:49 PM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 04:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)