10-18-2013, 09:29 PM
If you compare lenses with such a difference in focal length it's just not what I call comparison, and I put the 28-300 only in to exaggerate towards the other direction. For a lot of people 70mm is just not enough - and for those who are happy with it there are already more options than only that Tamron you find so interesting.
So, why exclude those from a comparison? And by the way: Hey, why don't YOU do the comparison and tell us what you found? I mean, it's always easier to tell others what they should work on instead of doing it myself.
So, why exclude those from a comparison? And by the way: Hey, why don't YOU do the comparison and tell us what you found? I mean, it's always easier to tell others what they should work on instead of doing it myself.