07-18-2013, 10:45 AM
Hi Abhishek
I have a NEX-5 and for me it has a good value. It is small, so you can put it in a small bag. I had a DSLS(A700) before and it was a nice camera but very bulky.
What I now really miss on a camera without it is the tilt screen. I shoot most of my photos form the hip because the shake is reduces very much and the perspective is more interesting too. The tilt screen is helping too for the sun reflections. One of the NEX-5 advantages is that it is not gotten that serious so people are more relaxed. ;-)
I'm using Rawtherapee and you can use many difference demosaic algorithms with it. Foe example lmmse and igv are producing much better high ISO images. In my opinion the discussing if Fuji is better at high ISO is more about demosaic algorithms than about sensor performance.
But in the end I would recommend the RX100. It is so small, has RAW and the image quality is good enough for many use cases. Maybe there are limits at the wide angle and the tele but you will get the camera much more often with you. So it is a tradeoff.
Actually I don't believe that you will do anything wrong with a m43 or APS-C mirror less.
I have a NEX-5 and for me it has a good value. It is small, so you can put it in a small bag. I had a DSLS(A700) before and it was a nice camera but very bulky.
What I now really miss on a camera without it is the tilt screen. I shoot most of my photos form the hip because the shake is reduces very much and the perspective is more interesting too. The tilt screen is helping too for the sun reflections. One of the NEX-5 advantages is that it is not gotten that serious so people are more relaxed. ;-)
I'm using Rawtherapee and you can use many difference demosaic algorithms with it. Foe example lmmse and igv are producing much better high ISO images. In my opinion the discussing if Fuji is better at high ISO is more about demosaic algorithms than about sensor performance.
But in the end I would recommend the RX100. It is so small, has RAW and the image quality is good enough for many use cases. Maybe there are limits at the wide angle and the tele but you will get the camera much more often with you. So it is a tradeoff.
Actually I don't believe that you will do anything wrong with a m43 or APS-C mirror less.