[nandadevieast]

Imagine a FF lens with that performance (esp. on the corners), wouldn't that be "truely awesome" ?...

 

Besides, I was trying to mention the fact that manufacturing a (fast) lens with a larger image circle is more challenging than a cropped lens with the same performance (bigger glasses, less tolerance in production etc...). But of course from another perspective, this is the MFT's strength (as we see it from the chart). An awesome lens with a reasonable price, exceptional MTF50 performance and a very usable DOF controll...

 

Serkan

 

Serkan, Sorry i mis-spelled your name earlier...

I thought that M43 lenses have to be better than FF lenses because 16 megapixel M43 sensor is harsher on the lenses than today's FF sensors. May be my concept is not in place (it generally isn't)...but the way we compare D7000 to D800...when we test a lens on D7000, we say that it will perform similarly on a D800 because both cameras are similarly pixel dense. Going by that, the lens performance on a 16 mp M43 sensor should equate with a 64mp FF sensor...so if a lens is great for 16mp M43 camera, it should be great for a 64 mp FF camera as well, theoretically speaking. Can you clarify this for me...?

anurag