[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1348046153' post='20275']
Joachim, I think the fact that Olympus refreshed only the EPL & EPM and not the E-P line has more to do with them not wanting to come up with the same design as previous E-P's with just an E-M5 sensor (it had touch screen already, etc,...). I think they need more time for at least two reasons : 1*redesign properly the E-P & 2*give some air to the OM-D so that the EP doesn't compete with it even if I think the OMD line centered "faux dslr" style will remain the only design featuring the newer&large shutter&IS unit (explaining the centered hump) for a little while. A proper differentiator and simply because it wouldn't fit, IMHO.
So I think the next EP could have a "rangefinder" EVF with the smaller&classic shutter&IS unit, allowing for a decentered viewer. Well, that's my hope.
Just my 2 cents,
S.
[/quote]
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for replying. I have just seen [url="http://fourthirds-user.com/galleries/data/550/9180001.jpg"]http://fourthirds-us...550/9180001.jpg[/url] a sliced E-M5. There is nothing which suggests that the "centered hump" is required for the better IS unit - though we don't know unless we hear an Olympus statement.
I assume the "faux dslr" style is due to the E-300 not selling but the E-500 being quite a success. They were essentially the same camera (apart from tweaks in the firmware).
Your argument about giving the next E-P is interesting. Anyway, with the price of the E-PL5 having gone up over the E-PL3 and the E-M5 having come down in price there is presently not enough space for another model. So an E-P5 coming later might have some mileage. We will see.
What I learned about the E-PL5 so far, not having a second dial, possibly no orientation sensor and a simplified IS is putting me off a bit of the one.
Thanks again
Joachim
Joachim, I think the fact that Olympus refreshed only the EPL & EPM and not the E-P line has more to do with them not wanting to come up with the same design as previous E-P's with just an E-M5 sensor (it had touch screen already, etc,...). I think they need more time for at least two reasons : 1*redesign properly the E-P & 2*give some air to the OM-D so that the EP doesn't compete with it even if I think the OMD line centered "faux dslr" style will remain the only design featuring the newer&large shutter&IS unit (explaining the centered hump) for a little while. A proper differentiator and simply because it wouldn't fit, IMHO.
So I think the next EP could have a "rangefinder" EVF with the smaller&classic shutter&IS unit, allowing for a decentered viewer. Well, that's my hope.
Just my 2 cents,
S.
[/quote]
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for replying. I have just seen [url="http://fourthirds-user.com/galleries/data/550/9180001.jpg"]http://fourthirds-us...550/9180001.jpg[/url] a sliced E-M5. There is nothing which suggests that the "centered hump" is required for the better IS unit - though we don't know unless we hear an Olympus statement.
I assume the "faux dslr" style is due to the E-300 not selling but the E-500 being quite a success. They were essentially the same camera (apart from tweaks in the firmware).
Your argument about giving the next E-P is interesting. Anyway, with the price of the E-PL5 having gone up over the E-PL3 and the E-M5 having come down in price there is presently not enough space for another model. So an E-P5 coming later might have some mileage. We will see.
What I learned about the E-PL5 so far, not having a second dial, possibly no orientation sensor and a simplified IS is putting me off a bit of the one.
Thanks again
Joachim
enjoy