09-20-2012, 05:04 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1348086865' post='20298']
I'm a bit confused is there a bigger deference between e-p; epl and epm ?
[/quote]
Hi you2
Thanks for participating. Depends a bit on what you want & need. The way I view it: the key differences are in the build and the user-interface. The E-PM line is geared towards easy automated use, while the E-P line is geared towards those which seek more control.
If you set the camera to all-auto on day 1 and leave it there, the differences are most likely not so important. Key issues for me with the E-PL5 is the lack of the second dial under your thumb and, according to the first reports, the lack of an orientation sensor. I understand the latter implies you have to rotate all images manually. This is 2012 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' />
Joachim
I'm a bit confused is there a bigger deference between e-p; epl and epm ?
[/quote]
Hi you2
Thanks for participating. Depends a bit on what you want & need. The way I view it: the key differences are in the build and the user-interface. The E-PM line is geared towards easy automated use, while the E-P line is geared towards those which seek more control.
If you set the camera to all-auto on day 1 and leave it there, the differences are most likely not so important. Key issues for me with the E-PL5 is the lack of the second dial under your thumb and, according to the first reports, the lack of an orientation sensor. I understand the latter implies you have to rotate all images manually. This is 2012 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' />
Joachim
enjoy