Opticallimits > Forums > Just Talk > SLT vs. SLR
Opticallimits > Forums > Just Talk > SLT vs. SLR

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
SLT vs. SLR
nandadevieast Offline
Member
***
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 0
#14
07-25-2012, 08:26 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1343149299' post='19584']

Yes, it means that every ISO setting is a little noisier than if there was not that translucent mirror in the camera design. The differences are not huge anyway, so not something to worry about much. Especially since the used Sony sensors have such low read noise.

[/quote]



Thanks <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />
Website Find
Reply
  


Messages In This Thread
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-21-2012, 07:47 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Klaus - 07-21-2012, 08:35 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-21-2012, 08:54 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 05:59 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 08:32 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 12:03 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 01:07 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 04:25 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 04:58 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 06:21 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:05 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:10 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-24-2012, 05:01 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-25-2012, 08:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)