07-19-2012, 05:42 PM
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1342620828' post='19458']
It seems dpreview provided initially wrong data concerning the sensor, which indicated that the G5 would feature a multi-aspect sensor. Unfortunately, Pana decided to cripple the G5 in this regard.
[/quote]
Not sure why they only put the multi aspect sensors only in the GH series... maybe it is a problem fabricating them (they obviously are bigger than the other sensors Pana produces?). And of course, the heavy price permium they (can) ask for the GH series would fall away when the G-series got the same sensor size.
Indeed, it would be nice to have the GH-series-sized sensors in the compacts too.
It seems dpreview provided initially wrong data concerning the sensor, which indicated that the G5 would feature a multi-aspect sensor. Unfortunately, Pana decided to cripple the G5 in this regard.
[/quote]
Not sure why they only put the multi aspect sensors only in the GH series... maybe it is a problem fabricating them (they obviously are bigger than the other sensors Pana produces?). And of course, the heavy price permium they (can) ask for the GH series would fall away when the G-series got the same sensor size.
Indeed, it would be nice to have the GH-series-sized sensors in the compacts too.