04-24-2012, 03:34 PM
[quote name='Bare' timestamp='1335108860' post='17694']
Pleasa explain how you see a comparison.
[/quote]
My apologies, Bare. I had read "mansurov" a while ago, but a lot has changed in his review now. Now his samples make much more sense. I was busy making something silly this weekend and skipped over the article way too fast, again my apologies <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> .
One thing I would like to point out though... He scales down the files to equalize image size. This is not the right way, as it influences to a great deal the noise (can get exaggerated, can get smoothed over, depending on used software/algorithm.
What is a better way is to increase in size the lower resolution files. This will both give an idea of the extra detail the higher resolution files will give, and it will more accurately show the noise impact.
Pleasa explain how you see a comparison.
[/quote]
My apologies, Bare. I had read "mansurov" a while ago, but a lot has changed in his review now. Now his samples make much more sense. I was busy making something silly this weekend and skipped over the article way too fast, again my apologies <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> .One thing I would like to point out though... He scales down the files to equalize image size. This is not the right way, as it influences to a great deal the noise (can get exaggerated, can get smoothed over, depending on used software/algorithm.
What is a better way is to increase in size the lower resolution files. This will both give an idea of the extra detail the higher resolution files will give, and it will more accurately show the noise impact.