03-15-2012, 05:43 PM
You're a JPEG-shooter? The only photographers known to me really depending on JPEG are journalists, reporters who have no time to spend in postprocessing but have to deliver NOW. Sport shooters may have an advantage, too. Using a much smaller file size the buffer will allow about twice the numbers in burst mode. DPreview states ca. 36 RAWs compared to 78 images in JPEG.
In my humble opinion a JPEG-shooter have to know a lot more about the camera's limitations and have to take more care about issues like clipping, dynamic range, noise, in-camera noise reduction, sharpening, colour rendering/colour temperature etc. pp. compared to a RAW-user.
My 2 cents.
Ciao, Walter
In my humble opinion a JPEG-shooter have to know a lot more about the camera's limitations and have to take more care about issues like clipping, dynamic range, noise, in-camera noise reduction, sharpening, colour rendering/colour temperature etc. pp. compared to a RAW-user.
My 2 cents.
Ciao, Walter