Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H
#2
  • First, you see more noise than I could detect, I guess.
  • Second, it's no native X3F file, but a DNG and processed in Lightroom. LR is not well-known fpr highest image quality, Adobe already messed up with Fuji files. If there is noise or bad paint job or whatever, I would be interested in comparing the source file - which is not possible, because I need to decide which RAW format the camera shall record. DNG just doubles the file-size... For this reason I really feel sorry that I Iost all test-shots because of a card- or user-problem. Would have been interesting to see what CaptureOne gets out of it.
  • Third, it's no camera for you anyway  Big Grin you mentioned countless times the Foveon disadvantages, so why waste more time on it?
  


Messages In This Thread
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H - by JJ_SO - 06-01-2017, 04:06 PM
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H - by JJ_SO - 06-01-2017, 07:00 PM
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H - by borisbg - 06-02-2017, 02:41 AM
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H - by JJ_SO - 06-02-2017, 05:14 AM
DPReview reviews Sigma SD Quattro H - by JJ_SO - 06-02-2017, 05:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)