Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Diffraction numbers
#6
[quote name='Rainer' timestamp='1320787482' post='12775']

You overlook one word in Wims post ... in this case an important one ... "inverse" ...



1/x + 1/y = 1/z



you calculated 1/x + 1/y = z



so .. take the inverse of 0.0438 ... and you are there!



Rainer

[/quote]

Yes, the inverse needs to be taken, but we are not there yet <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />.



The 3.2 X pixel spacing formula serves to calculate the aperture at which a sensor is diffraction limited, not the resolution <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />. I made that more clear in my post. The resolution obviously is the sensor height in pixels divided by the sensor height in mm, divided by two to get to lp/mm (Nyquist fequency expressed a different way). I added that to my original reply.



Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
  


Messages In This Thread
Diffraction numbers - by ssh33 - 11-08-2011, 04:58 PM
Diffraction numbers - by wim - 11-08-2011, 05:28 PM
Diffraction numbers - by ssh33 - 11-08-2011, 08:19 PM
Diffraction numbers - by Rainer - 11-08-2011, 09:24 PM
Diffraction numbers - by wim - 11-08-2011, 09:28 PM
Diffraction numbers - by wim - 11-08-2011, 09:40 PM
Diffraction numbers - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 08:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)