Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In defense of the sh*t lens
#3
"I have read many, many posts like this, ..., which they all believed performed better than we measured".



What does this tell you?



I have not read onereport other than PZ giving the 18-35 such a bad review.



PZ's own Lens Performance This is most likely spam content has the 18-35 rated higher than: 18-70, 18-135 and 18-200.



Apart from Bjorn, Thom Hogan rates this lens highly. You probably would point out that TH also tested this lens "only" on the D1 and D100.



How that unmentionable person - Ken R?



You can like him or hate him but he has "real world" comparisons between this lens and a bunch of others.



For example, here:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/comparisons/24mm/



And it was tested on a d3!



KR even goes further to say "this plastic 18-35mm is actually a little bit sharper on my D3 than the 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S and the 20-35mm AF-D"



Pure fantasy? Perhaps. But he made the statement based on Real images at Real distances. Correct me if I am wrong, but someone mentioned to me that PZ's resolution testing is based on minimum or near-minimum distances. If this is the case, any conclusions are meaningless.





"Sorry, but that doesn't tell us anything about what to expect on a 16 MP DX sensor or even FX."



I made my tests on a D300.

According to PZ, the 18-35mm @35mm and f4.5 (D7000) gives: 2145(center); 1175(border); 1073(extreme)

vs 18-55 VR at f5 2588(center); 2131(border); 1929(extreme)



This is simply wrong. At 35mm the 18-35 is visibly better wide open on my tests against every lens tested against, including the 35mm f/2 at f4!







"we can talk about facts instead of hurt feelings".

Testing and concluding using one and only one sample does not lead to facts.



Hurt feelings? Are you kidding me?

Look, I would like, and I'm sure we would all like PZ to be a reliable site for information on photographic equipment, in particular, lenses!



"please be so kind and loan us your unit"

Granted, you have some problems with getting various samples.



I can not lend you my copy since it is my most used lens. However, I would like to contribute to PZ by lending some others that I do not use so frequently. For example, my trusty 75-150mm Series E, the outstanding 50-135mm f/3.5 and a few others.



And finally, some photos with the 18-35. It's not about resolutions. It's all about the light!

[Image: pz1.jpg]

[Image: pz2.jpg]

[Image: pz3.jpg]

[Image: pz4.jpg]
  


Messages In This Thread
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-07-2011, 09:05 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-07-2011, 09:52 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-08-2011, 08:12 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-08-2011, 08:36 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by netrex - 11-08-2011, 09:26 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-08-2011, 09:46 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-08-2011, 09:50 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by netrex - 11-08-2011, 10:28 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by popo - 11-08-2011, 01:01 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by arvydas - 11-08-2011, 01:10 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Guest - 11-08-2011, 01:24 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Guest - 11-08-2011, 01:28 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-08-2011, 01:28 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-08-2011, 02:35 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by wim - 11-08-2011, 02:47 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by wim - 11-08-2011, 02:56 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Guest - 11-08-2011, 05:01 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by popo - 11-08-2011, 05:55 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-09-2011, 02:15 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by arvydas - 11-09-2011, 08:33 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 08:53 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 10:13 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 10:48 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 11:12 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 11:46 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 12:21 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Guest - 11-09-2011, 01:14 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 01:18 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 01:22 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-09-2011, 01:26 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 01:27 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-09-2011, 01:37 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 01:46 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 01:50 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 02:17 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 02:21 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-09-2011, 02:32 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-09-2011, 03:26 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-09-2011, 03:46 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-09-2011, 04:03 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 04:22 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-09-2011, 05:12 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-09-2011, 06:23 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by bryan conner - 11-09-2011, 06:37 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 06:39 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-09-2011, 06:54 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-09-2011, 07:06 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-09-2011, 09:03 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by frank - 11-10-2011, 06:25 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mousefire - 11-10-2011, 06:27 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-10-2011, 06:40 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by edge - 11-10-2011, 01:27 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-10-2011, 02:25 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by IanCD - 11-10-2011, 07:53 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-10-2011, 08:04 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by IanCD - 11-10-2011, 08:37 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-10-2011, 09:28 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-10-2011, 09:36 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-10-2011, 10:05 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by IanCD - 11-10-2011, 10:25 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-11-2011, 09:13 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by arvydas - 11-11-2011, 09:33 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-11-2011, 11:49 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-11-2011, 01:06 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-11-2011, 02:27 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-11-2011, 03:05 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by stevenb - 11-11-2011, 03:31 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Klaus - 11-11-2011, 04:42 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by youpii - 11-11-2011, 05:12 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Klaus - 11-11-2011, 05:22 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by anyscreenamewilldo - 11-11-2011, 06:49 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by stevenb - 11-11-2011, 10:10 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-11-2011, 10:18 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by youpii - 11-12-2011, 01:41 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by bryan conner - 11-12-2011, 06:56 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-12-2011, 07:09 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by mst - 11-12-2011, 07:17 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Brightcolours - 11-12-2011, 09:15 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-12-2011, 09:23 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by bryan conner - 11-12-2011, 01:29 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Studor13 - 11-13-2011, 04:03 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by bryan conner - 11-13-2011, 05:58 PM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by youpii - 11-14-2011, 12:03 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by anyscreenamewilldo - 11-14-2011, 06:39 AM
In defense of the sh*t lens - by Steinar1 - 11-14-2011, 11:08 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)