09-22-2011, 08:09 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316677384' post='11759']
That doesn't look promising. However, the MTFs only show the extreme ends of the focal ranges, it will be interesting so see how the lenses behave inbetween.
On the other hand, it wouldn't be really suprising if the superzoom turned out to be the best of the (current) bunch. It's by far the largest (and most expensive) lens.
The pancake is probably more about portability than performance (unfortunately).
-- Markus
[/quote]
You could argue that these MTFs show the performance fully open.
However, e.g. the 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 is actually a "27-81mm f/9.5-15" so given the dependency of diffraction they should perform best at max. aperture. Even the "fast" 10mm f/2.8 is just a "27mm f/7.5". Hmmmh ....
That doesn't look promising. However, the MTFs only show the extreme ends of the focal ranges, it will be interesting so see how the lenses behave inbetween.
On the other hand, it wouldn't be really suprising if the superzoom turned out to be the best of the (current) bunch. It's by far the largest (and most expensive) lens.
The pancake is probably more about portability than performance (unfortunately).
-- Markus
[/quote]
You could argue that these MTFs show the performance fully open.
However, e.g. the 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 is actually a "27-81mm f/9.5-15" so given the dependency of diffraction they should perform best at max. aperture. Even the "fast" 10mm f/2.8 is just a "27mm f/7.5". Hmmmh ....