04-14-2011, 09:45 AM
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1302766811' post='7628']
Should I call myself a lucky guy?
My two tamron lenses work flawless. Funny enough they ware first sample that I’ve got from shop.
1.tamron 17-50 non VC – despite sporadic forum reports for missfocussing problems, my lens focus perfectly on canon 400d and 50d.
2.Tamron 70-300 VC – focus is fast and spot on. VC is ok. Combo 50d+T70-300vc is very capable setup for wildlife photography. I have a situation when the whole lens, lens hood and part of camera ware in ice while AF was still working ok.
3.A friend of mine bought Tamron 60/2 macro. I’ve tested and used this lens for a while. No under or overexposure at my canon 400d,50d and my friend 550d.
greetings,
Miro
[/quote]
The exposure issues are Nikon only, seems to have to do with the way the aperture is set on the lenses. You are not the only one having no trouble with the 70-300 USD VC.
Should I call myself a lucky guy?
My two tamron lenses work flawless. Funny enough they ware first sample that I’ve got from shop.
1.tamron 17-50 non VC – despite sporadic forum reports for missfocussing problems, my lens focus perfectly on canon 400d and 50d.
2.Tamron 70-300 VC – focus is fast and spot on. VC is ok. Combo 50d+T70-300vc is very capable setup for wildlife photography. I have a situation when the whole lens, lens hood and part of camera ware in ice while AF was still working ok.
3.A friend of mine bought Tamron 60/2 macro. I’ve tested and used this lens for a while. No under or overexposure at my canon 400d,50d and my friend 550d.
greetings,
Miro
[/quote]
The exposure issues are Nikon only, seems to have to do with the way the aperture is set on the lenses. You are not the only one having no trouble with the 70-300 USD VC.