04-09-2011, 05:24 PM
Yea. When I made my comment it was off of the pictures of the ducks; the feathers seem to smear but again it might be simply the sharpness factor in the post processing. The actual resolution seems very decent. The bokeh is a real negative though. Still I'm very surprise by the raw resolution numbers. For me personally I normally shoot in the 25-100 range; but in college I spent many weekends in the Rockies and keep thinking about returning with a camera in which case I would need some sort of long lens (several times i cross path with herds of elks and similar up at the mountain lakes).
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1302368124' post='7512']
This is at 400mm @ f/5.6
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/active/magic/get.jsp?id=1243362564_rkMPm&format=v"]http://www.opticallimits.com/active/magic/get.jsp?id=1243362564_rkMPm&format=v[/url]
Looks plenty sharp to me.
[/quote]
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1302368124' post='7512']
This is at 400mm @ f/5.6
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/active/magic/get.jsp?id=1243362564_rkMPm&format=v"]http://www.opticallimits.com/active/magic/get.jsp?id=1243362564_rkMPm&format=v[/url]
Looks plenty sharp to me.
[/quote]