04-11-2011, 09:07 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1302338609' post='7507']
Very good for such a lens - no wonder that we haven't seen a replacement yet.[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/609-canon100400f4556ff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/609-canon100400f4556ff[/url]
Puuh, I'm finally starting to see the end of the (full format test) tunnel in EOS land. :-)
[/quote]
Thanks Klaus for an excellent review. I wanted to question whether the 3.5 star optical rating could have been a 4 (especially considering what the alternatives are) but I decided against it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> , knowing all the caveats around the star ratings <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Were you considering to update the existing APS-C review to a test on the 50D or is it not worth the trouble? Would you expect to see much difference?
Very good for such a lens - no wonder that we haven't seen a replacement yet.[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/609-canon100400f4556ff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/609-canon100400f4556ff[/url]
Puuh, I'm finally starting to see the end of the (full format test) tunnel in EOS land. :-)
[/quote]
Thanks Klaus for an excellent review. I wanted to question whether the 3.5 star optical rating could have been a 4 (especially considering what the alternatives are) but I decided against it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> , knowing all the caveats around the star ratings <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Were you considering to update the existing APS-C review to a test on the 50D or is it not worth the trouble? Would you expect to see much difference?