12-19-2010, 10:58 PM
[quote name='backcountryskier' timestamp='1292799136' post='5119']
Disappointing. Given the price tag and modest apertures I was expecting optical performance in the same league as 70-200/2.8 IS mk2 and 70-200/4 IS. Guess not.[/quote]
There are far more expensive lenses that perform far less than 70-200 2.8 IS II or a 70-200 f4 IS...
[quote name='backcountryskier' timestamp='1292799136' post='5119']
In all it doesn't seem like a huge improvement over the old non-L model.
[/quote]
I think that's where it all is... in the 4.3x zoom league.
GTW
Disappointing. Given the price tag and modest apertures I was expecting optical performance in the same league as 70-200/2.8 IS mk2 and 70-200/4 IS. Guess not.[/quote]
There are far more expensive lenses that perform far less than 70-200 2.8 IS II or a 70-200 f4 IS...
[quote name='backcountryskier' timestamp='1292799136' post='5119']
In all it doesn't seem like a huge improvement over the old non-L model.
[/quote]
I think that's where it all is... in the 4.3x zoom league.
GTW