Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED
#3
Hi Kenny,



welcome on board.



[quote name='Kenny' timestamp='1292590692' post='5069']

Under DX, I notice this lens resolution is higher than 14-24mm on center but the border resolution is better on 14-24mm. In this case, if I am shooting sunrise/sunset landscape, I should consider better border resolution which is 14-24mm, right ?[/quote]



The FX review isn't finished, yet, but you can assume the same behaviour on FX, too. Very high center resolution, but less sharpness in borders and corners than 14-24. If I remember the numbers correctly, also a little less than the 16-35 VR.



So, for landscapes, the 14-24 is probably the best of these three ... unless you plan to use filters regularly. Also note that the 14-24 tends to flare a lot, however not necessarily when the sun is actually in the frame.



Another option would be one of the Zeiss wide angle lenses: ZF 18/3.5 or ZF 21/2.8.



[quote name='Kenny' timestamp='1292590692' post='5069']

Also, hope to see the 35mm f/1.4G review (my friend is keen to see the review before buy it)[/quote]



This lens will be reviewed within the next months, but I cannot tell you when, yet. The 85/1.4 will probably come first.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Messages In This Thread
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by kentcp - 12-17-2010, 12:58 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by wojtt - 12-17-2010, 02:14 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by mst - 12-17-2010, 02:15 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by Brightcolours - 12-17-2010, 03:48 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by mst - 12-17-2010, 03:51 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by PuxaVida - 12-17-2010, 04:44 PM
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED - by kentcp - 12-18-2010, 03:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)