12-14-2010, 04:01 PM
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1292295820' post='4978']
Let's all talk about the iphone camera because it lets you shoot nice pictures:
http://www.flickriver.com/groups/takenwi...teresting/
And it's [url="http://www.flickr.com/cameras/"]one of the most popular[/url] cameras out there at the moment.
I don't know about you but when I'm in doubt, I pause my actions until I know better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
[/quote]
I know you like to poke and stir at times, but I do find jennben's posts at times a bit odd and "biased" to Nikon (even though he shoots Canon at the moment, I believe). He loves to point out that the D7000 has very low noise at base ISO (low noise in very dark shadows in particular), and he is right in pointing that out. But whenever something else very valid gets pointed out (in this case the better IQ when no quick and dirty NR has been applied to smudge the data) he finds not only the loss of detail important, but labels the whole discussion irrelevant/needless.
Lets try a nudge less stirring (even though I find your post in this instance very funny), and lets try to be a little bit more open to other voices (jennben).
Let's all talk about the iphone camera because it lets you shoot nice pictures:
http://www.flickriver.com/groups/takenwi...teresting/
And it's [url="http://www.flickr.com/cameras/"]one of the most popular[/url] cameras out there at the moment.
I don't know about you but when I'm in doubt, I pause my actions until I know better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW
[/quote]
I know you like to poke and stir at times, but I do find jennben's posts at times a bit odd and "biased" to Nikon (even though he shoots Canon at the moment, I believe). He loves to point out that the D7000 has very low noise at base ISO (low noise in very dark shadows in particular), and he is right in pointing that out. But whenever something else very valid gets pointed out (in this case the better IQ when no quick and dirty NR has been applied to smudge the data) he finds not only the loss of detail important, but labels the whole discussion irrelevant/needless.
Lets try a nudge less stirring (even though I find your post in this instance very funny), and lets try to be a little bit more open to other voices (jennben).