Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ?
#9
[quote name='dave9t5' timestamp='1290983406' post='4543']

I can see my house!

[/quote]

This bit of extra sharpness surely would allow slightly larger prints. From any kind of sensible viewing distance no moire would be visible. Especially not in the very dark grill of the tram. AA filters make most sense for fashion Photographers, because fabric is with few exceptions (fences maybe)the only subject which contains such high frequency regular pattern capable of causing visible moire. Note that the fences in your pics contain no visible moire at all. For landscape and portrait shooters removal AA-filters makes some sense. I just wonder if people do really print that big for the resolution advantage to become visible. I guess there is reason why AA filterless cameras are only availabe as medium format pro bodies.
  


Messages In This Thread
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Tiz - 11-28-2010, 05:30 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by allanmb - 11-28-2010, 07:44 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by PuxaVida - 11-28-2010, 08:26 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Guest - 11-28-2010, 11:19 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Guest - 11-28-2010, 11:19 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Guest - 11-29-2010, 04:03 AM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by deejjjaaaa - 11-29-2010, 07:26 AM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by deejjjaaaa - 11-29-2010, 07:34 AM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by netrex - 11-29-2010, 03:47 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by sth - 11-29-2010, 09:06 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Sylvain - 11-30-2010, 08:14 PM
Poll : AA-less images - how good or bad ? - by Tiz - 11-30-2010, 08:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)