11-16-2010, 05:57 PM
I did previously change a 50D for a 5D1, and to me it was not worth it. To me, the main reason for going full frame is the potential shallower DoF it can provide over smaller sensors in a given condition. I later found out I didn't need it, and I missed having live view too.
I would say only change if you're really sure the 5D offers you something you need to do but can't currently. If you feel technologically limited at the moment, identify what that limitation is and what ways there may be to resolve it.
I would say only change if you're really sure the 5D offers you something you need to do but can't currently. If you feel technologically limited at the moment, identify what that limitation is and what ways there may be to resolve it.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.