09-26-2010, 02:59 PM
As we all know, the 16mm f/2.8 prime for Sony's Nex cameras get quite a bit of bad press from the reviews. But how field-relevant are these claims?
Comparing a Nex-5 + 16mm f/2.8 to one of the best FF DSLR landscape/wide combos, the 5D MkII + 24 1.4L II, is a bit of a strange comparison. Yes, we all know which is the winner (or do we?), but let's see how big or small the differences are (see large image in link):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/5025935854/
![[Image: 5025935854_aede867040.jpg]](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/5025935854_aede867040.jpg)
Hope this was useful in some way... please share your own views <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
Comparing a Nex-5 + 16mm f/2.8 to one of the best FF DSLR landscape/wide combos, the 5D MkII + 24 1.4L II, is a bit of a strange comparison. Yes, we all know which is the winner (or do we?), but let's see how big or small the differences are (see large image in link):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/5025935854/
Hope this was useful in some way... please share your own views <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW