08-04-2010, 07:18 AM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1280872643' post='1476']
If you look at the samples there, while the processed image is far better than a blurry one, there are various processing artefacts remaining. I don't know if they can be improved further, but perhaps this can be used as an extra level of stabilisation after lens or sensor shift has ran out of steam. As it stands, it isn't a substitute for taking a steady shot if you want the best quality.
[/quote]
I agree - I think this solution is just a sort of add-on to the regular hardware stabilization. However, very interesting approach which shows that there is still some room for improvements left in the DSLR world <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Bye Sebastian
If you look at the samples there, while the processed image is far better than a blurry one, there are various processing artefacts remaining. I don't know if they can be improved further, but perhaps this can be used as an extra level of stabilisation after lens or sensor shift has ran out of steam. As it stands, it isn't a substitute for taking a steady shot if you want the best quality.
[/quote]
I agree - I think this solution is just a sort of add-on to the regular hardware stabilization. However, very interesting approach which shows that there is still some room for improvements left in the DSLR world <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Bye Sebastian