08-10-2010, 02:13 PM
[quote name='allanmb' timestamp='1280911882' post='1482']
I really dislike the results. If you look at the hi-res images there is no more detail and they seem to introduce a lot of ghosting. I think you are better off scrapping the image still... Although I do admit its an interesting approach!
Allan
[/quote]
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1281412439' post='1615']
It's just "digital" stabilisation assisted by hardware... you lose resolution...
[/quote]
Well, it is quite a bit better than the original, non-processed image, and way better than no image, if you'd ask me <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
I really dislike the results. If you look at the hi-res images there is no more detail and they seem to introduce a lot of ghosting. I think you are better off scrapping the image still... Although I do admit its an interesting approach!
Allan
[/quote]
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1281412439' post='1615']
It's just "digital" stabilisation assisted by hardware... you lose resolution...
[/quote]
Well, it is quite a bit better than the original, non-processed image, and way better than no image, if you'd ask me <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....