The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 895 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.8 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 895 errorHandler->error




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback
#1
Hello zoners,



I received my 45-200 yesterday knowing fully it's not the greatest lens ever but that it can produce decent results when used with care and I intend to take it along to my scotland trip next month.MUDGES.



Still, I'm not entirely convinced about it with regard to its output.

I find that CA are a bit too much although I know that most reviews were on G1 and its CA auto correction. Something lacking on my E-P1. And I find it quite soft too, not really comparing well to PZone samples.



I don't think there are many mFT shooters around PZone, and probably even less with a 45-200 but I wanted to ask if anybody could relate to the following :

-It needs extremely high shutter speeds at 200mm, something like 1/800s @200mm with mega OIS activated and clearly active on the lcd. I'm aware that the arm heavy holding position of the E-P1 (away from the body) makes it less stable than the typical holding position but it seems to me rather incredible to be this sensible.



-strong exposure shifts while changing the aperture. I've tested the DOF preview to check if the aperture had any problem, it seems it's moving properly on every 1/3 of a stop. It seems partly due to the vignetting correcting itself from wide open to one stop down, but could it make such a difference?



-doesn't seem to be improving at all when stopping down on longer focal lengths, confirmed by Klaus' test.



-the obligatory "full size samples check" : would you rate these acceptable?

All unprocessed RAW from LR3 converted to JPEG 90% quality, 200mm @f/5.6

*Warning : ~5MB files*



[url="http://www.catbag.net/sylvain/temp/PanaG45200-001.jpg"]Sample 1[/url]

[url="http://www.catbag.net/sylvain/temp/PanaG45200-002.jpg"]Sample 2[/url]

Here's the same with some edits.I added a hint of sharpness and tried to suppress (slider set to -75 on the Blue/Yellow slider, didn't need to touch red/cyan, surprisingly) on the 7 & 10.

[url="http://www.catbag.net/sylvain/temp/PanaG45200-003.jpg"]Sample 2bis[/url]

[url="http://www.catbag.net/sylvain/temp/PanaG45200-004.jpg"]Sample 3[/url]



Any opinion,experience or comments welcome!



Greetings,

Sylvain
  


Messages In This Thread
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-29-2010, 01:39 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-29-2010, 05:58 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-29-2010, 06:11 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-29-2010, 10:47 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-29-2010, 10:53 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-30-2010, 11:57 AM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Sylvain - 07-30-2010, 12:17 PM
Panasonic Lumix 45-200 f/4-5.6 user feedback - by Guest - 08-01-2010, 07:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)