07-28-2010, 01:39 PM
[quote name='Pinhole' timestamp='1280312841' post='1359']
Just a question Markus:
Is that really all sensor dirt? I've never seen a hair look so defined if its lying on a sensor, nor dust spots. On my camera, it just produce an undefined dark 'blob' unless it's on the lens somewhere.
[/quote]
Well, hairs are also considered to be dust in this regard <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And a dust shaking mechanism does seem to get rid of those very effectively <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
If it is on the lens somewhere, it should actually not show up at all, BTW, unless you use a fisheye or UWA lens for macro <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
Kind regards, Wim
Just a question Markus:
Is that really all sensor dirt? I've never seen a hair look so defined if its lying on a sensor, nor dust spots. On my camera, it just produce an undefined dark 'blob' unless it's on the lens somewhere.
[/quote]
Well, hairs are also considered to be dust in this regard <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And a dust shaking mechanism does seem to get rid of those very effectively <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.If it is on the lens somewhere, it should actually not show up at all, BTW, unless you use a fisheye or UWA lens for macro <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....