Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8
#2
It's crazy sharp and renders very well - but I don't think, you would be happy with it. Speed is one thing, limited focal range and weight and seize are others. It's more for those who want a really fast 18 mm and are happy to get 20, 24, 28 and 35 along with it. Walking around through a city in the evening, only that lens, a decent body, no tripod. I liked it, but it's tricky to focus on Nikon DSLR and at the end of the day, it doesn't beat a fast FF lens like 20, 24, 35 f/1.4.

  


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by toni-a - 02-28-2017, 04:54 PM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by JJ_SO - 02-28-2017, 06:05 PM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by toni-a - 02-28-2017, 06:59 PM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by JJ_SO - 02-28-2017, 08:40 PM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by casperl - 03-07-2017, 06:25 AM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by JJ_SO - 03-07-2017, 06:51 AM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by casperl - 03-07-2017, 07:29 AM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by JJ_SO - 03-07-2017, 08:45 AM
Sigma 18-35f1.8 ART vs 17-55f2.8 - by casperl - 03-08-2017, 01:07 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)