07-01-2010, 08:58 PM
My fault -- read "Sigma's best product in this class so far." as "best product in this class so far ". Please forgive me.
I should take a nap.
[quote name='Klaus' date='01 July 2010 - 09:51 PM' timestamp='1278017513' post='793']
Where do I state that ?
" starting at f/4 it beats or at least matches alternative products including the more expensive Canon EF-S 17-55m f/2.8 USM IS"
So obviously it does not beat it at f/2.8.
And the Sigma has an IS (OS) of course. The build quality is "different" compared to the Canon - more "tight" but less sophisticated.
[/quote]
I should take a nap.
[quote name='Klaus' date='01 July 2010 - 09:51 PM' timestamp='1278017513' post='793']
Where do I state that ?
" starting at f/4 it beats or at least matches alternative products including the more expensive Canon EF-S 17-55m f/2.8 USM IS"
So obviously it does not beat it at f/2.8.
And the Sigma has an IS (OS) of course. The build quality is "different" compared to the Canon - more "tight" but less sophisticated.
[/quote]