06-28-2010, 07:05 AM
The Tamron 90 Macro is 100€ cheaper and a great macro lens. From the test it looks like f/22 is the only aperture where these lenses differ and where the Nikon shines.
I wonder how some lenses produce really really bad results at f/22 and others (newer ones) do fairly well. Has there been some advancement in the design of aperture blades?
I wonder how some lenses produce really really bad results at f/22 and others (newer ones) do fairly well. Has there been some advancement in the design of aperture blades?