Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G
#9
[quote name='wim' date='15 June 2010 - 07:46 AM' timestamp='1276552014' post='521']

Based on my own tests and comparisons, I totally agree <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />. I owned a 14-24, with G-EOS adapter, and sold the lens after acquiring the TS-E 17. The 14-24 is no competition for the TS-E. Neither is the ZE with its huge field relevant vignetting, and I am not even talking about the 18 distagon <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />.

Nah, even cropping a 12 mm image to 14 mm, or even 18 mm, is not going to give you the same quality, not even close <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />. I got a 12-24, best of three, and when I saw the results in real life I ran back to the shop, and exchanged it for above mentioned Nikkor 14-24, even though it cost twice as much (Of course, than then got superceded by the TS-E 17 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />).



However, the 14L II is actually not bad at all for a fast 14 mm. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />

[/quote]



Agree... the TS-E 17 is a gorgeous lens. It's a must have for UWA fans, T/S aside. The T/S is a good bonus too.



[quote name='wim' date='15 June 2010 - 07:46 AM' timestamp='1276552014' post='521']

However, F/2.8 in an extreme UWA is great for low light shooting <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />.

[/quote]



Sometimes I get too lazy to do a bulb exposure and try to get everything in 30s <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' /> But I think the main benefit of such fast apertures (combined with high ISOs) is allowing you to do exposure previews quicker, for very low light static scenes.
  


Messages In This Thread
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 05:25 AM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 01:02 PM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 11:53 PM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-15-2010, 12:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)