(01-10-2019, 04:04 PM)thxbb12 Wrote:It even has better background bokeh and less LoCA :-O(01-10-2019, 02:32 PM)Brightcolours Wrote:(01-10-2019, 12:09 AM)JJ_SO Wrote: The 35 is a bit thinner, about same length as the Sigma Art version, yes - so not smaller. But a lot lighter: 358 to 659 grams. I don't think they could become much smaller
That Canon lens does look quite a bit smaller, even though both designs contain 11 elements.
Yep, and it does macro on top of it which makes it much more versatile.
The Canon is a much more interesting proposition.
Won't mount on Nikon Z, though. But who knows, maybe the 4mm difference will make an adapter possible in future, from some enterprising company?