03-23-2020, 09:46 PM
The Sigma should eat the Canon 20/2.8 for breakfast, lunch, dinner and whatnot. Nobody except Ken Rockwell had anything good to say about the 2.8. :-)
If someone needs an "as wide as it gets" f/1.4 lens (and not specifically a 20mm for FF) it looks like the prime (pardon the pun) contender. I chose a 24/1.4 on similar grounds, but if the Sigma 20 had existed during that time, maybe I would've chosen it instead. So I can see Toni's point here.
If someone needs an "as wide as it gets" f/1.4 lens (and not specifically a 20mm for FF) it looks like the prime (pardon the pun) contender. I chose a 24/1.4 on similar grounds, but if the Sigma 20 had existed during that time, maybe I would've chosen it instead. So I can see Toni's point here.