Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panasonic Lumix Pro 70-200mm f/2.8 OIS and 16-35mm f/4 announced
#11
(11-07-2019, 06:19 PM)Brightcolours Wrote: About FF and small aperture primes... Why go for FF if you are not after the possibility of shallow DOF? What sense do you see in FF sensor + small aperture lenses over smaller sensor cameras?

I was just debunking Joju's statement about FF being necessarily bigger than MFT.

I like to have the choice: smallish aperture lenses when I want a light and compact setup and large aperture lenses when I need shallow DOF.
What's nice with FF is that you could fairly easily have both worlds. Not so with MFT, unless you buy mega expensive and huge glass. APS-C is pretty descent, but I believe FF could be made about the same size if not smaller while being able to offer shallow DOF with wide-angle lenses.

And I'd rather use only a single system instead of switching between FF, APS-C and MFT.
--Florent

Flickr gallery
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Panasonic Lumix Pro 70-200mm f/2.8 OIS and 16-35mm f/4 announced - by thxbb12 - 11-07-2019, 08:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)