08-21-2020, 07:19 AM
;-)
I knew that this would trigger you. LOL.
But seriously - when I look at the IQ comparison thingy in dpreview, the M6 II produces much higher noise levels than its 24mp peers.
Of course, that's not unexpected but it also shows that 32mp and high ISO don't go together - just as 50mp+ for FF (and to ease your pain - that also applies to the A7R IV).
You may argue that you just need to scale down but this defies the purpose really.
Compared to MFT, Sony and Fuji, the EOS M lens lineup remains poor - there isn't even a "24-xx" zoom lens and nothingness in the long tele segment.
And sorry, adapters don't count in my book - adapters are just a pathetic attempt to hide the fact that native lenses are just not available.
I knew that this would trigger you. LOL.
But seriously - when I look at the IQ comparison thingy in dpreview, the M6 II produces much higher noise levels than its 24mp peers.
Of course, that's not unexpected but it also shows that 32mp and high ISO don't go together - just as 50mp+ for FF (and to ease your pain - that also applies to the A7R IV).
You may argue that you just need to scale down but this defies the purpose really.
Compared to MFT, Sony and Fuji, the EOS M lens lineup remains poor - there isn't even a "24-xx" zoom lens and nothingness in the long tele segment.
And sorry, adapters don't count in my book - adapters are just a pathetic attempt to hide the fact that native lenses are just not available.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji