Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ?
#22
Quote:I shoot 100% Raw with my old 5D because it gives visibly better results than OOC Jpgs 

in every situation and every type of light. The Jpg-Engine of the 5D is really really weak.

 

So ... no nonsense , I believe.

 

Anyhow, you asked not to emphasise or judge the way we shoot.

And what do you do next? Insult those who shoot raw!

You do excatly what you ask the others to stop doing!

May be something to think about?

 

Rainer
with 5D I tend to go the same way, not because of the JPG engine but 11MP RAW files are very easy to handle on modern fast PCs, you have everything a JPG file would give, previewing, thumbnails, almost any software can open them, you have the ability to correct any errors, and converting 50RAW files to JPG is a matter of minutes
  


Messages In This Thread
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:28 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 10:54 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-18-2016, 02:25 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 03:53 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 05:16 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 06:05 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:39 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 06:55 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-19-2016, 07:49 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 01:30 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by toni-a - 11-19-2016, 03:14 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-22-2016, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)