[Rover]

Fun thing is, I keep hearing that this lens is f/6.3 until the last few millimetres. Wonder why they couldn't/ wouldn't just shave these off, round up and market it as f/6.3, which probably sits better with the user base (after all, f/6.3 has seemingly been accepted - if grudgingly - as a "valid" max aperture in lieu of f/5.6, but everything narrower is still frowned upon).

Wonder what else they'll bring to Z mount. I'm still eyeing that with interest, and the 50-400 would make a killer two-lens combo with a wideangle ... At least in theory.