Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Fujinon XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
#4
The (uncorrected) pincushion distortion would give the lens, at least theoretically, a bit better resolution in the diagonal corners compared to orthogonal borders?

 

I didn't realize, but Fuji sells an Arca-compatible plate for the dwarfish tripod-socket. Makes me wonder why not using a bigger plate and integrating an Arca-type swallow-tail? Sigma did that quite nicely (but expensive) with their additional foot for the 150-600 Sports.

 

I would hope for a firmware update for that lens to adjust the focus limiter. 5 m ... ∞ is really no big use, I would also need one from 1.75 m...3 m. And if I aim at closer distances, the twin motor AF is not exactly silent by scrubbing through the range.

 

But those are details, basically I find the lens worth the price.

  


Messages In This Thread
next PZ lens test report: Fujinon XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR - by JJ_SO - 08-31-2016, 04:09 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)