08-09-2016, 07:30 AM
Landscapes can be photographed with a whole range of focal lengths. If you decided on a very wide FOV24 to 20mm is fine.
The Zeiss is very expensive. It will be fine with waterfall spay, as will other lenses, just don't take a shower with them. Your camera won't like that.
The Canon EF 24mm f2.8 IS USM will be fine too, just less wide, less heavy and less expensive. With DPP you can get better results with the Canon than with the Zeiss due to DPP's DLO part.
Landscape photos usually are taken with closed down apertures, so big aperture primes are not thaaaat important. So you can also look at the EF 16-35mm f4 L IS USM. It will give you a range of focal lengths.
A very small travel option would be the Voigtlander 20mm f3.5 SL II N. And the old Canon EF 20mm f2.8 USM still does a pretty good job for closed down landscape stuff.
The Zeiss is very expensive. It will be fine with waterfall spay, as will other lenses, just don't take a shower with them. Your camera won't like that.
The Canon EF 24mm f2.8 IS USM will be fine too, just less wide, less heavy and less expensive. With DPP you can get better results with the Canon than with the Zeiss due to DPP's DLO part.
Landscape photos usually are taken with closed down apertures, so big aperture primes are not thaaaat important. So you can also look at the EF 16-35mm f4 L IS USM. It will give you a range of focal lengths.
A very small travel option would be the Voigtlander 20mm f3.5 SL II N. And the old Canon EF 20mm f2.8 USM still does a pretty good job for closed down landscape stuff.