The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 895 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.8 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 895 errorHandler->error




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS
#1
Today I saw Sigma 50-100 ART, I am hesitating to get it.

it is not stabilized, this is the major drawback.

Since I am on dual system full frame and APS-C, I am wondering what is the better choice, getting a 70-200f2.8 OS or the 50-100f1.8, it is not about low light capacity but about sharpness, bokeh and what you ask from a portrait lens.

which one do you expect to be the better choice ?

 

  


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by toni-a - 05-19-2016, 06:23 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Klaus - 05-20-2016, 11:31 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Rover - 05-23-2016, 02:36 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 03:37 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 07:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)