02-08-2016, 02:12 PM
Quote:Thank god that it has no IS if you ask me.I can understand the reviewer's point of view. But from the practical standpoint... WTF?
Come to think of it; the Canon 17-55 was the reason I've chosen the Canon system back in the day... I did so just because the Canon 17-55 was stabilized whereas the Nikon one was/is not (for the same price). I haven't been disappointed since. So this Fuji 16-55 is bucking the trend.