[Rover]

You cannot compare an f/1.4 lens to an f/2 lens... the former is inevitably going to be larger, especially if it's well corrected. So if one 35mm lens can be small, it doesn't mean all of them have to be small.

It's a walk on the large side. To me 35mm (equivalent) primes have to be small. It's a Zen thing to me. I liked my Planar 35/2 (Contax G) when shooting film.


Would have liked one of these: <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/35mm-f14.htm">http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/35mm-f14.htm</a> but the price was never my house number.


The Canon is just to large on my books. Not very Zen to me