Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-Cameras/PEN-Lenses/M-Zuiko-Digital-12-50mm-f3-5-6-3-Standard-Wide-Zoo.aspx
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='[url="tel:1323844684"]1323844684[/url]' post='13736']
[url="http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-Cameras/PEN-Lenses/M-Zuiko-Digital-12-50mm-f3-5-6-3-Standard-Wide-Zoo.aspx"]http://www.olympus.c...d-Wide-Zoo.aspx[/url]
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
[/quote]
But it seems to have a constant physical length.
Posts: 87
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
0
Its only 0.36x, the 0.72 value is a "35mm equivalent". Since they are happy to apply these "35mm equivalent" multiplication factors to maximum focal length and now macro, why not be consistent and also advertise the equivalent aperture...
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1323855460' post='13746']
A cool feature - 0.7x max. magnification based on a floating system design.
211g
Actually a perfect lens for hiking it seems.
[/quote]
Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
[quote name='Ayoh' timestamp='1323856404' post='13749']
Its only 0.36x, the 0.72 value is a "35mm equivalent". Since they are happy to apply these "35mm equivalent" multiplication factors to maximum focal length and now macro, why not be consistent and also advertise the equivalent aperture...
[/quote]
Ah, ok.
Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1323844684' post='13736']
[url="http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-Cameras/PEN-Lenses/M-Zuiko-Digital-12-50mm-f3-5-6-3-Standard-Wide-Zoo.aspx"]http://www.olympus.c...d-Wide-Zoo.aspx[/url]
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
[/quote]
MTFs:
http://asia.olympus-imaging.com/products/dslr/mlenses/12-50_35-63_ez/images/mtf_02.gif
Not bad (remember that they provide the MTFs at 60lp/mm) but not better than for the 14-42 actually.
Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
57 mm Ø, 83 mm is still pretty small.