02-07-2012, 04:09 AM
Thread Rating:
Nikon D800/D800E official
|
02-07-2012, 04:32 AM
... and a first hands-on preview: http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikonD800/
02-07-2012, 05:15 AM
[quote name='walter_g' timestamp='1328587757' post='15583']
[url="http://nikon.com/news/2012/0207_dslr_01.htm"]http://nikon.com/new...207_dslr_01.htm[/url] [url="http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/index.htm"]http://imaging.nikon.../d800/index.htm[/url] [/quote] No AA filter in the D800E ... nice.
02-07-2012, 06:08 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1328591739' post='15589']
No AA filter in the D800E ... nice. [/quote] Have you seen, even on this one it costs money to remove the AA-filter? With 15MP in APS-C, this is essentially level with an D7000..You could use a single body for DX and FX testing <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ![]() Now the critical questions: - will it blend? - does it clean? J.
enjoy
02-07-2012, 06:37 AM
Why does the version without AA cost more money?
02-07-2012, 06:52 AM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1328596655' post='15594']
Why does the version without AA cost more money? [/quote] Could be a couple of things. If sensors are normally produced with AA filter, then there are costs associated with having a batch without or actually removing it ( peeled potatos are more expensive <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ![]() ![]() J.
enjoy
02-07-2012, 06:53 AM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1328596655' post='15594']
Why does the version without AA cost more money? [/quote] Because they can ask more ... Technically there's no reason IMHO.
02-07-2012, 07:26 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1328597623' post='15596']
Because they can ask more ... Technically there's no reason IMHO. [/quote] It's all a bit more complicated then expected: http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_p...1674-12304
02-07-2012, 07:36 AM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1328594929' post='15593']
With 15MP in APS-C, this is essentially level with an D7000..You could use a single body for DX and FX testing <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ![]() [/quote] But we'd have to start both sections from scratch <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ![]() -- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
02-07-2012, 07:41 AM
I am curious how many Nikon lenses can match the 36MP resoluion on D800. My impression was that many (or some?) lenses already struggled a lot on the 24MP D3x.
Another question is on the lens diffraction. For a 36MP FX, at f5.6 the diffusion circle of red light is already larger than the sensor pixel size; while for the blue light the diffusion circle starts to become larger than the pixel size from around f10. Frank |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
Created by: Mishar DESIGN
Powered by: MyBB