Posts: 1,254
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
Sharpness is believable.
What I have a hard time believing is the distortion figures: I bet these are not native (raw) figures but corrected ones.
Also, I disagree with the quality of the bokeh. They find it nice and pleasing but I find it harsh and bad.
Posts: 3,151
Threads: 36
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
22
06-12-2018, 11:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2018, 11:11 AM by Rover.)
It's the sharpness charts that I have (more than) a little trouble believing in... same level of sharpness in the center and on the edges? In a decently fast wide angle near pancake lens on full frame? Yeah, and pigs can fly.
I would like to see what Klaus has to say about this lens - scientifically - but I'm not holding my breath, as usual. For all we know, we may be getting the next review (of any lens) by autumn at this pace.
Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
22
Which image shows harsh and bad bokeh?
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
When was the last time you saw a bad review from ephotozine?