[Rover]

Pretty early to release an update to the 28-75 I think, and the redesign is not limited to the mechanical aspects it seems...
https://www.dpreview.com/news/4612246904/tamron-developing-second-generation-28-75mm-f2-8-di-iii-vxd-for-e-mount
The 35-150/2-2.8 is a remarkable entry though. Fully a stop faster throughout the range vs. the DSLR version and not that much bulkier at the same time, or so it seems.
https://www.dpreview.com/news/7696771958/tamron-35-150mm-f2-2-8-di-iii-vxd-for-full-frame-sony-e-mount-on-the-way

[Klaus]

Quite an improvement

https://www.tamron.com/assets/img/press_release/20210805_2/a063_mtf.jpg

The 35-150mm f/2-2.8 is a nice variation to the usual stuff.

I'm wondering who is going to buy all these E-mount lenses - there are now 133 (+2) and that's only counting those with AF. Including MF there are 411 (+2). That's just nuts.

[toni-a]

35-150f2.8 is an absolutely interesting lens for me as long as they keep weight and size reasonable for portraiture, at least for me it's by far more practical to have 35-150 than 70-200 for portraiture

[Rover]

Well, and to think we've been appalled by the lack of lenses early on. Things change so much.
It's also pretty telling that the RF and Z mount shooters are often seen on the forums (like DPReview) asking when the third-party lens X or Y is going to be released for their systems, usually only to get the answer to the tune of "when the fat lady sings".

I'm also thinking that the new Sigma 150-600 and Tamron 35-150 lenses would mesh pretty well, as though they've been announced simultaneously on purpose.

[you2]

I guess this means the E mount is popular ?

[wim]

I guess this means the E mount is popular ?

Popular enoough, and easy to make a lens for, as Sony has made the mechanical and electrical design parameters freely available.