Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lytro not going so good, I suppose
#8
The "sharpness of output" was just absent or at a very low level. Personally, I don't see the point of the light field tech anymore: to me, photography is about decision what I like to be seen in the picture. Leave that all to the viewing person, and worse, force the viewing person to download technical aid just to view a second hand experience is nothing I want to waste money, time or disk-space for me or other people.

 

And I think, when I get 40 MB (or 10 MB jpgs) files with decent sharpness and dynamics, how much more would a combination of sharpness layers be? DoF is important to me and if I want to have everything sharp, I can use focusstacking.

 

Tony Northrop made the remark, that the camera need to be rebooted quite often (in comparison  to other cameras).
  


Messages In This Thread
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by davidmanze - 11-04-2015, 08:52 PM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by popo - 11-05-2015, 12:06 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by toni-a - 11-05-2015, 08:19 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by mst - 11-05-2015, 08:38 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by mst - 11-05-2015, 09:03 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by JJ_SO - 11-05-2015, 10:07 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by davidmanze - 11-05-2015, 11:49 AM
Lytro not going so good, I suppose - by JJ_SO - 11-05-2015, 12:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)